Civil Liberties

The 2006 case, join States v. J stars, revisited a very all-important(a) issue that has been and continues to be troublesome to tactic as the reading expected privacy perpetually changes with our constantly changing world. In 2008 Antoine Jones was sentenced to life in prisons for conspiracy to distribute and to possess with flavour to distribute five or more kilograms of cocaine and 50 or more grams of cocaine base. The United States v. K nonts, on which the prosecutors relied, helped bear out the use of some of information obtained from the GPS tracking device. In the put forward that resulted in overturn of Jones conviction, it argued that although, in Knotts,(a) person traveling in an automobile on frequent thoroughfares has no reasonable prospect of privacy in his movements from one place to another, this does not imply to movements whatsoever. In Knotts, the suspect was tracked from point A to B (100 mile), whereas Jones was tracked 24 hours a day for 4 weeks. Because some courts deemed the use of a GPS tracking device not a search  then not a usurpation of the fourth amendment and the court of appeals did, quick clarification was needed. In 2011 the US Supreme Court ease up the petition for Writ of Certiorari, which is a document that a losing society files with the Supreme Court ask the Supreme Court to check out the decision of a turn down court. In this documents, it presented the wonder Whether the warrantless use of a tracking device on respondents vehicle to monitor its movements on humanity streets violated the fourth amendments.  \nTo nurse citizens against electronic intrusion in places a one would study private, the Harlans reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test was employed, booting out the forward common-law trespassory test. This has created a class of opportunity for law enforcement to physically and technically trespass on ones property if deemed person had no expectation of privacy . In summary, th. ..